From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Subject: Re: [babel] Re: Re: [OT] gnuplot quality Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:27:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87iq5j2ry0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87eigde28n.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3vw8shu.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87631o8ebj.fsf@gmail.com> <87wru4uhux.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ocfcifl8.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50843 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OOpqh-0006XZ-0R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:28:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOpqf-00006b-JY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:27:58 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:51319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOpqf-0008VE-FM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:27:57 -0400 Received: by mail-fx0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 15so492844fxm.0 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:27:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ocfcifl8.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:35:15 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: org-mode mailing list Eric S Fraga writes: > I am surprised, however, at this comment: > >> Gnuplot was ok when I didn't need quailty graphs. > > in what way does gnuplot fall short in terms of quality? (but keep > this part of the conversatino off-list please to avoid annoying others) I can't speak for others, but I'm very interested in this and have found the suggestions in the thread very useful, so please keep it on-list! After all, a lot of Org users (will) need some kind of plotting solution, so this kind of discussion is naturally useful to them. After all, disregarding unwanted e-mails is definitely easier than getting to see the off-list ones ;-) =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n