From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Behavior of Gnus when called from an hyperlink Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87iq4a6sla.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87r5jrcx9g.fsf@mundaneum.com> <8763138nna.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87ocev5pn3.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87fx071fsg.fsf@mundaneum.com> <23582.1277735944@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87vd936wiq.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87eifr3t52.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87vd8gcu6k.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87oce7j26i.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87fwzjfyf8.fsf@mundaneum.com> <878w5bkxx7.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87hbjyzicz.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <13292.1279382554@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87zkxpanh1.fsf@mundaneum.com> <23154.1279399784@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87zkxpg5cg.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87wrstn4a9.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87fwzf51t1.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87d3ujbrwt.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87wrsrmcnf.fsf@mundaneum.com> <8739ve9wyz.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41059 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObFU2-00081l-BC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:15:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObFQE-0007MB-8y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:11:59 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObFQD-0007Lt-Rz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:11:58 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObFQC-0004O6-6C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:11:56 +0200 Received: from dslb-084-061-104-211.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.61.104.211]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:11:56 +0200 Received: from tassilo by dslb-084-061-104-211.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:11:56 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bernt Hansen writes: Hi Bernt, > I have an IMAP server on my local 100MB/sec network and one of my > (spam) folders has 148200 messages in it. If I link to one of those > messages in Gnus, close Gnus, and access the link from org-mode it > finds the email in 13 seconds (8 seconds if Gnus is already open which > is how I normally leave it running) > > If you are accessing your mail server on a slower network then that > will adversely affect your response times. No, that shouldn't affect the total time that much, at least in this case. It's only one request and one reply that go over the net. The 5 minutes searching are what really matters, and that's only on the server. > Mirroring your mail server with offline imap or some other tool and > linking to the local mirror might help your access times. If Sébastien's admins tell him that they cannot get the search faster, that would be a good investment. I recommend Dovecot as server and OfflineIMAP for synchronizing the local with possibly many remote accounts/servers. Dovecot has plugins even to do index every mail completely, and then you can use Gnus' nnir backend to perform searches for arbitrary text in the mails (including text in the bodies) in nearly instant time. But of course, that adds another layer of indirection requiring some configs. IMO, when you often rename/create/delete IMAP folders, OfflineIMAP doesn't do to well, at least in my limited experiences. It's designed to never ever loose mail (which is surely most important), but when deleting folders on the local Dovecot using Gnus, the deletion never propagated to the remote server and the next synchronization fetched the deleted folder again from the remote side... Bye, Tassilo