From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] Changes to lists Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:08:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87ipx2o1va.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> References: <87k4hve0y7.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <878vy35ilw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34453 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkfGC-0002C2-79 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:08:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkfGA-0002VI-TO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:08:47 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:53470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkfGA-0002VE-NA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:08:46 -0500 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so719917bwz.0 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:08:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878vy35ilw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: Org Mode List Hello, > Note the ending and immediate starting of an enumerate environment > after the listing corresponding to the babel octave code. I cannot reproduce it with: ----- * babel results overwrite following text 1. start an item so that following is indented: #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var x=10 (+ (* 3 x) 6) #+end_src #+results: : 36 2. a second item starts here ----- Are you sure it still happens with a recent branch? Is it specific to octave? > By the way, although a fix that required the babel code to be > indented to the same level as the meta statements would be > satisfactory, a solution that allowed code within the block to be > indented to any position would be more welcome. Code written in the > mode associated with the particular language will often be > automatically indented... Normally, lists should not pay attention to anything inside blocks so I highly doubt it is related to indentation of code. Sorry for not being very helpful here. Regards, -- Nicolas