From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Feature request: Select links by description [7.4] Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:05:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87ipwqvksf.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42182 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnrkU-0000uc-0J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnrkS-0007q9-QN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:17 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:52650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnrkS-0007px-FR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:16 -0500 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so3098041bwz.0 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:05:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:27:10 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Dave, Dave Abrahams writes: > When using org-insert-link, it would be far better for me to have it > show me the _descriptions_ of links (the default link text), rather > than showing me the links themselves. This is especially true of > email links, which are generally long and unintelligible by > themselves. > > I have something set up that stores a link to every email I send, so I > can easily link to follow-ups in my active Org items. As a result, I > end up with *lots* of stored links, which makes this a real struggle. `org-insert-link' *does* already displays the description of the links like this: http://orgmode.org (Org Mode website) http://orgmode.org/worg/ (Worg website) The description is within the parenthese. I think it's good to have both the link *and* the description. What would be a better way of presenting the description? -- Bastien