From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: :noweb header argument Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87ipkk9d7o.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <801ur8rnjg.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkX1P-0002er-0D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:25:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkX1I-0004Bp-PI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:25:30 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:34574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkX1I-0004Bi-KD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:25:24 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkX1F-0001rJ-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:25:21 +0100 Received: from genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.140.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:25:21 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:25:21 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: [...] >> I think it might be good to have a parameter that expands noweb >> references on evaluation and tangling, but leaves them alone during >> export. This way the code block would be fully functional, but wouldn't >> duplicate code during export (when the noweb references are to other >> code blocks in the same document). > > I'd find that interesting as well, but then the names of the code blocks must > be visible again (in HTML and PDF exports), something that has disappeared > over time. +1 for both 1) the :noweb no-export or similar 2) and the possibility to include source block names in export - Andreas