From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Sexp aganda entries broken? Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:31:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip9a7ebr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <50998D60.300@gmx.de> <509DA8C2.9000502@gmx.de> <87ehk1da0y.fsf@gmail.com> <509E8A5F.3080403@gmx.de> <87r4o1bf3y.fsf@gmail.com> <509EF600.8060403@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY0jq-0002Vh-Vr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:36:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY0jn-0001Ql-Tb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:36:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <509EF600.8060403@gmx.de> (Simon Thum's message of "Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:49:04 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Simon Thum Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode Simon Thum writes: > I see, it just seemed to me that org-contacts uses it for (seemingly) > good reasons and there is no replacement or deprecation. Is there > missing consensus on this syntax? I don't think so. AFAIU this syntax was created to include diary entries without the overhead of generating the diary first. There are not meant to be used as a replacement for timestamps. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou