From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] e-latex back-end: changes to attributes syntax Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:23:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip8p92fx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87haoiewwr.fsf@gmail.com> <20121126003917.GB9942@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87fw3w2jc6.fsf@gmail.com> <20121128132735.GA5988@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdjXs-0003ii-IJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:27:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdjXr-0002BX-F6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:27:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:56704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdjXr-0002BQ-91 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:27:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id c10so3959610wiw.12 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:27:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121128132735.GA5988@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> (Suvayu Ali's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:27:35 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Suvayu Ali Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Suvayu Ali writes: > Personally I think having the option to shoot myself in the foot is > preferable over not being able to configure. But then others may not > agree. Is it possible to disallow :overlay when :environment is > provided? If so you could generate a warning during export. > > That said, the way I see it, most widely used list-like environments are > of the "new item on a new line" kind (which are supported by overlays). > I wanted to use inparaenum for ease of editing, in my slide I wanted an > inline list (where overlays aren't really needed). So setting the two > attributes simultaneously is probably very unlikely. > > I am quoting my use case below in case that helps the discussion. > Something like item (1) would have been nice, however I ended up using > (2). > > > 1) Asymmetries can be constructed that are, > #+attr_beamer: :environment "inparaenum" :options "i)" > 1. CP-odd, > 2. CPT-odd and > 3. T-odd > > 2) Asymmetries can be constructed that are, i) CP-odd, ii) CPT-odd and > iii) T-odd. Case 1 should now be supported. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou