From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: OT, but not really: todays XKCD Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:49:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip5w1of3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <9C4C997C2CA6AA488CBC8C9E56E764EE26450A98@MBX04.uva.nl> <87liavcfov.fsf@gmail.com> <878v6ufcnq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87sj528bjm.fsf@gmail.com> <87r4kmdpa1.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ip5yvydi.fsf@gmail.com> <87bobp6tj2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Zrj-0007zr-7H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:47:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Zrh-0006YM-9j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:47:03 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]:45182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Zrh-0006Y7-3M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:47:01 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z53so917425wey.1 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 02:47:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bobp6tj2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:15:21 +1030") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org List" Hi Eric, Eric S Fraga writes: > If there is a consensus on the list that I am going against some form of > etiquette for this list, I am happy to change my settings. I have no > interest in annoying people! Accepting standard use of Mail-Followup-To on this list is fine. Let see if someone directly impacted complains one day. For Gnus users who find your MFT confusing, there is this option: (setq message-use-mail-followup-to nil) Thanks, -- Bastien