From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [babel] Commenting out src blocks for tangling Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:44:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip5ceprr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87r4k18wy2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mwup8t0q.fsf@breezy.my.home> <87bob58sdi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <512e97cf.82c1ec0a.76d4.ffffc5f1@mx.google.com> <512F1CDF.80906@gmail.com> <877glsg57i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <867gls9451.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB02o-00061v-6x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:44:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB02n-0007Vk-0U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:44:54 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB02m-0007Vd-QX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:44:52 -0500 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UB035-0002Dt-Pz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:45:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <867gls9451.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:30:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Bastien wrote: >> Rainer M Krug writes: >> >>> I agree - COMMENTing a subtree should automatically disable tangling of >>> code blocks in the subtree. Would this something which could be introduced >>> easily, as it seems there are quite a few who assumed that it would be >>> doing it? >> >> This is now the case in master: >> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=8e0b45 > > Does it work as well for the `:noexport:' tag? No. :noexport: is meaningful in the context of exporting, not in the context of tangling. -- Bastien