From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:23:49 +0530 Message-ID: <87ip3ju0ua.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9ovye43.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871ua7zrvt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USty2-0002g1-D9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:54:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USty1-0002Cl-Ag for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:53:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:36630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USty1-0002CS-4C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:53:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id jh10so1783069pab.10 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:53:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (John Hendy's message of "Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:10:13 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy Cc: emacs-orgmode > Just trying to reconcile my understanding of your situation with how > you write about it. This post (not by me) summarizes my position well. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-04/msg00096.html I have also criticized FSF's arbitrary handling of my request here. http://lwn.net/Articles/547737/ If you move over to emacs-devel, you will see some of the commenters there are very guarded in their response. It will only go on to show that I raise valid questions. People who have flamed me cannot differentiate between oranges and lemons. It is not their work that is at stake. So they can just call me a troll and dismiss the broader questions I am raising. Jambunathan K.