From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe Brauer Subject: Re: org-mime Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:31:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87ip2mq7xq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87ppwvzxzq.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwrypnra.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55455) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcAe1-0006wr-2o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 04:31:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcAdw-0003nk-GH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 04:31:37 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcAdw-0003nc-9n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 04:31:32 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UcAdr-0003Gl-Nn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 10:31:27 +0200 Received: from 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es ([85.55.19.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 10:31:27 +0200 Received: from oub by 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 10:31:27 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> "Eric" == Eric Schulte writes: > Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >> >> - > A while back Org-mode switched its method of exporting latex equations > to HTML. Equations used to be exported as png images, however they are > now exported as markup which may then be processed on the fly by > client-side javascript. Most mail readers do not allow javascript in > html email, and I doubt that the required javascript headers are > included in the mail html mime part. > I don't know if it is currently possible to do the javascript > pre-processing as part of the HTML export, but that would probably be > the best solution in this case. Couldn't the old functionality (converting to png) be reactivated, at least optionally?? For me this change are bad news, since the feature (to export LaTeX math to something visible) is very important to me and even if this approach may have disadvantages, it seems to me more universal than the javascript business. Uwe Brauer