From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: RFQ - new contribution - org-screenshot.el Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87ip2hogwx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87mwru8f57.wl%max@openchat.com> <874ne23zir.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppwqawei.fsf@krugs.de> <87li7d99db.wl%max@openchat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdL29-0001PD-E7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:49:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdL28-00069K-4q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:49:21 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:54690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdL27-00069D-VP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:49:20 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q57so3822636wes.9 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 06:49:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87li7d99db.wl%max@openchat.com> (Max Mikhanosha's message of "Fri, 17 May 2013 06:41:20 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Max Mikhanosha Cc: "Rainer M. Krug" , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Max, Max Mikhanosha writes: > My list is. > > 1. Convert defvar to defcustom > > 2. Is (require 'dired) fine? It uses macro `dired-mark-if' defined in > dired.el Seems fine to me. > 3. The prefix C-c M-s seems awkward but Org is so big everything else > is taken, and C-c C-x s is too close to C-c C-x C-s, which is > archive subtree (I initially had it there and moved after archiving > subtree by mistake) I'd favor reserving C-c C-x for core packages, and use anything else for contrib/ packages. > Its its fine to go in as is, then its fine too, I'm pretty lazy :-) Whatever sounds more practical to you! You can include it now, have more eyes watching (after) your code, then feel the pressure to overcome the laziness in implementing the above :) -- Bastien