From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-html: Under html5-fancy, use <nav> for the ToC
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 22:52:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87ip0jzc9w.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <51AA6CAE.6040302@arfer.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42918)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Uwetl-0003cJ-2S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:52:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Uwetj-0006YB-Q8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:52:32 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]:62314)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Uwetj-0006Xs-Kv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:52:31 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t59so5039936wes.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51AA6CAE.6040302@arfer.net> (Kodi Arfer's message of "Sat, 01
	Jun 2013 17:50:38 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Kodi Arfer <kodi@arfer.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Kodi Arfer <kodi@arfer.net> writes:

> While I admit I'm not totally sure, in general, when a given fancy
> HTML5 element is appropriate, this case (an intra-page table of
> contents) seems right in line with the second code example here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-nav-element
>
> From a1aa357f75cd37ef676f5ac4dbbe66ad66d76aa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kodi Arfer <git@arfer.net>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 17:41:38 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] ox-html: Under html5-fancy, use <nav> for the ToC
>
> * lisp/ox-html.el (org-html-toc): Use <nav> instead of <div>
>   for the root element when appropriate.

Applied. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou