From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Ecay Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] [parser] org-element.el: Handle block parameters Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:15:57 -0400 Message-ID: <87iowdb92a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1382987074-19223-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com> <878uxca3p6.fsf@gmail.com> <8738njcrgl.fsf@gmail.com> <87iowfb325.fsf@gmail.com> <87ob66bdp5.fsf@gmail.com> <878ux9aens.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbwmr-00048v-Ai for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:16:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbwmm-0003Ff-Ol for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:16:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qe0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c02::230]:47663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbwmm-0003FZ-KT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:16:00 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d4so1949571qej.7 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:16:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878ux9aens.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, 2013ko urriak 31an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: [...] > Moreover, your proposal, IMO, is not well-enough defined. You merely add > a free-form string and call it "parameters". Parameters for what? Which > syntax: a plist, switches? I think a plist would work fine, indeed. > Why cannot some parameters fit into other affiliated keywords > (e.g. HEADER)? Very interesting. I did not realize that #+header: could apply to elements other than babel blocks. (Babel blocks are all that is documented in the manual, for example.) But a quick experiment shows that they can. I think #+header with a plist can accomplish all of what I wanted. So, if this is a reliable component of org syntax, I will focus on documenting it in the manual. If you like, I will also remove the references to block parameters on worg (or you can do it if you=E2=80=99d rather, since I think you originally wrote the syntax document). Thanks, --=20 Aaron Ecay