From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Unable to push to org-mobile Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:48:44 -0500 Message-ID: <87ioto4k4j.fsf@dokosmarshall.org> References: <13008CFE-91B9-4221-9DBB-96157A4A2FC6@gmail.com> <87mwk3us82.fsf@gmail.com> <87iouruoq2.fsf@gmail.com> <871u1eurka.fsf@gmail.com> <3DB9FA00-33DB-41C3-989E-660A4584C97B@gmail.com> <87r48d4b0g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878uule3fp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2YWh-0006QL-AS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:49:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2YWa-0001ad-0j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:49:23 -0500 Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7]:55333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2YWZ-0001aJ-SH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:49:15 -0500 Received: from lambdaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [98.110.175.184]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MZB00E2ZML96860@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:48:55 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: (Dror Atariah's message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:34:30 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dror Atariah Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nick Dokos Dror Atariah writes: > On Jan 12, 2014, at 14:26 PM, Bastien wrote: > >> Hi Dror, >> >> Dror Atariah writes: >> >>> So what's the point of the daily updates of the ELPA packages? >> >> To get bug fixed when you use ELPA. > > Wasn't the issue discussed originally in this thread a bug (and its > fix)? Why it is not reflected in the ELPA? I just want to understand > what's going on... No criticism or anything like that :) > Yes, and I should have committed the patch to maint as well, but I was not clear about the process either at the time. Thanks to Bastien for taking care of it. -- Nick