From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: dragging a line in agenda moves following hidden lines
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:39:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87iosvnov5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <878utrvq5c.fsf@algol.ziiuu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43227)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WAdPj-0007EP-Fm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:39:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WAdPd-0002ko-UL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:39:35 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:57378)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WAdPd-0002ki-Mq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:39:29 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u57so3842865wes.41
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 02:39:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <878utrvq5c.fsf@algol.ziiuu.com> (Thomas Morgan's message of
	"Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:32:15 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Thomas Morgan <tlm@ziiuu.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Thomas,

Thomas Morgan <tlm@ziiuu.com> writes:

> I think it would be more useful and intuitive for hidden lines not to be
> affected by dragging.

I agree to some extent, but this is difficult to achieve.

The agenda is read-only.  Dragging lines in agenda, although
permitted, is convenient for temporary views only.

Any re-display is likely to remove the re-ordering: `g' will
do; maybe re-displaying hidden lines (through `/ /') should
do so, too, if the current behavior is too confusing.  What
do you think?

-- 
 Bastien