From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joost Helberg Subject: Re: Babel-R vs. ESS Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:39:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87ionoopi0.fsf@snow.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzrDD-0003Bz-K1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:42:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzrD5-0004dA-Ol for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:42:23 -0400 Received: from mx.snow.nl ([213.154.248.146]:35224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzrD5-0004YR-JS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:42:15 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Shiyuan Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Shiyuan, Babel-R uses ESS (session: parameter) for R-evaluation and interactive development/debugging. Babel-R is more than sufficient for publications with mixed text and graphs. regards, Joost >>>>> "Shiyuan" == Shiyuan writes: > From: Shiyuan > To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Subject: [O] Babel-R vs. ESS > Date: 2014-06-25T09:08:29+0200 > Hi all, > I am learning R and use Emacs to work with R. I googled around and I found two options: ESS and Org-R/Org-Babel. > Babel speaks multiple languages( Any languages?-if we write some sort of parser, which I assume is not terribly > difficult under Babel?). > But if R is the primary language I would use, which option (Babel-R vs ESS) is more advisable? I do want a nice > integration of graphics/source code into a paper/slides. > Any suggestions/options are appreciated. > Shiyuan -- Snow B.V.