emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:01:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iomh87nr.fsf@gmx.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 878und1d6y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I suggest renaming ox-extra.el to ox-filters-extra.el and to have
>> org-mode/lisp/ox-filters.el for filters that are important enough
>> to be in core.
>>
>> I think Eric's filter is important enough to be in core, together
>> with an option to let users decide what tag should be used instead
>> of "ignore" (with "ignore" as a default).
>>
>> Filters are nice and not used enough, having some filters in core
>> can help teaching people how to use them.
>>
>> What do you all think?
>
> Filters are _not_ meant to be in core since they are hardly a generic
> solution for a class of problem. They are entry points for user-level
> hacking. Generic patches should operate at the parse tree level, not
> using regexps.
>
> Eric's filter, like any other filter, has flaws that cannot be fixed.
> Useful filters ought to be published in Worg, not included in core.

I agree with Nicolas, though I thought the inclusion was settled by
now.  Repeating myself upon the announcement of ox-extra.el¹:

    If it's helpful (enough) it should be ox.el, I guess, or
    ox-ENGINGE.el. . .  Parallel, semi-official extension to ox itself
    doesn't sound nice.

Worg → ox-filters is better IMO.  This would only become more true (in
my mind) if that — again IMO, horrendous — idea of splitting off
contrib is made into reality.

Cheers,
Rasmus

Footnotes: 
¹   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-06/msg00813.html

-- 
I feel emotional landscapes they puzzle me

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-12 16:49 proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties Mark Edgington
2014-06-12 17:32 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2014-06-12 17:41   ` Ken Mankoff
2014-06-12 18:11     ` Thorsten Jolitz
2014-06-12 18:16       ` Ken Mankoff
2014-06-13 14:32       ` Rasmus
2014-06-13 15:02         ` Thorsten Jolitz
2014-06-12 18:09   ` Mark Edgington
2014-06-12 18:12 ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-12 18:54   ` Aaron Ecay
2014-06-12 19:21     ` Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 19:26       ` Ken Mankoff
2014-06-12 19:52         ` Nicolas Girard
2014-06-13  1:20         ` Samuel Wales
2014-06-12 19:34       ` Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 20:13       ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-12 22:42         ` Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 23:36           ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-13  0:35         ` Ken Mankoff
2014-06-13  0:46           ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-13  2:35             ` Ken Mankoff
2014-06-13 11:11               ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-13  3:28             ` Mark Edgington
2014-06-13 14:23         ` Rasmus
2014-06-14 12:43         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-06-14 16:48           ` Mark Edgington
2014-06-14 18:12             ` Aaron Ecay
2014-06-14 18:12             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-06-14 18:07           ` Aaron Ecay
2014-06-14 18:22             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-06-14 22:39               ` Aaron Ecay
2014-06-16  1:14           ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-16  8:08             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-06-16 12:19               ` Mark Edgington
2014-06-16 13:29               ` Eric Schulte
2014-06-22  2:03                 ` Aaron Ecay
2014-06-22 23:52                   ` Eric Schulte
2014-07-27 17:21                     ` Bastien
2014-07-28 18:15                       ` Mark Edgington
2014-07-28 18:27                       ` Rasmus
2014-07-28 19:21                         ` Mark Edgington
2014-07-28 19:43                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-07-28 22:01                         ` Rasmus [this message]
2014-07-29 14:31                         ` Bastien
2014-08-02  5:16                           ` Mark Edgington
2014-08-06  4:09                             ` Aaron Ecay
2014-06-13  2:38 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2014-06-13  4:07   ` Mark Edgington
2014-06-13  4:44     ` Eric Abrahamsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iomh87nr.fsf@gmx.us \
    --to=rasmus@gmx.us \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).