From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make use of the constant `org-clock-string' whenever
 possible
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:11:47 +0200
Message-ID: <87iolenygs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87r403d7yk.fsf@konixwork.incubateur.ens-lyon.fr>
	<87ppfnhchd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87lhqaqtpa.fsf@konixwork.incubateur.ens-lyon.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36303)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XMYK7-0006Py-9P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:11:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XMYJx-0003wW-4X
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:11:19 -0400
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:57514)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XMYJw-0003ub-SZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:11:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87lhqaqtpa.fsf@konixwork.incubateur.ens-lyon.fr> (Samuel Loury's
	message of "Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:26:25 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Loury <konubinix@gmail.com>
Cc: OrgMode ML <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Samuel Loury <konubinix@gmail.com> writes:

> Nonetheless, please find attached a revised version of the patch with
> your comments taken into account.

Applied (with some spurious newlines removed). Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou