From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [patch] extend org-meta-return to keywords Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:00:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87ioi3ods1.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan> References: <87egszw8ui.fsf@gmx.us> <87wq6o3u57.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvdb4l6c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sihb4ede.fsf@pank.eu> <87lhn36nq1.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnny4ybq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <5471C038.4080102@free.fr> <873899503j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8738997sa2.fsf@gmx.us> <87ppcd3iqj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbm56b2q.fsf@gmx.us> <878uj139k1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a93h60s3.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtByd-0004dc-Bg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:00:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtByV-00056R-9g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:00:03 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:34825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtByV-00056B-0z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:59:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a93h60s3.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:54:20 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > From my point of view, we can make every function tied to M-RET beyond > `org-insert-headline' configurable and turned off by default. This may, > however, also add confusion ("why did M-RET work in X's Org but not in > mine..."). In this case, S-RET is a superior (as in less confusing) choice. Anyway, I assume M-RET on keywords is just a first step. So, what's the big picture? I think it would help to know the complete specifications of the M-RET you envision, as it could make more sense than the sum of its parts. Regards,