From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: org-time-stamp adds "repeater" where there is none.
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:00:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87iof2gly8.fsf@yahoo.fr>
References: <87zj8hol5b.fsf@yahoo.fr> <87oaoxtts5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46166)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>) id 1YNJPY-0007Gd-K0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:00:21 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>) id 1YNJPU-00031S-PJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:00:20 -0500
Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:48315)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>) id 1YNJPU-00031F-If
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:00:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87oaoxtts5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:56:26 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> <2015-02-13 ven.> (10h-13h)
>>
>> Hiting C-c . RET with point on the timestamp gives
>> <2015-02-13 ven. -13h> (10h-13h)
>>
>> which is not expected.
>
> It should now be fixed.
>
Thanks, works great so far (unlike my own patch, which would fail in
some situations).

-- 
Nicolas