From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citation syntax: Underscore MUST(?) be allowed in cite keys? Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:55:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87ioeeko2m.fsf@gmx.us> References: <874mq0399a.fsf@gmx.us> <54F75222.8030805@gmail.com> <87pp8o1t9f.fsf@gmx.us> <87pp8o6nt9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87fv9i9z8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oao6nxvx.fsf@gmx.us> <87lhja81y1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTwTb-0003nx-VE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:55:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTwTY-0008Rn-Q1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:55:55 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTwTY-0008Pg-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:55:52 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTwTW-0008P9-Rg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:55:50 +0100 Received: from tsn109-201-154-205.dyn.nltelcom.net ([109.201.154.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:55:50 +0100 Received: from rasmus by tsn109-201-154-205.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:55:50 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > While we're at it, as you noticed already, bare citation keys take > precedence over subscript. So, basically, one can never add subscript to > a word starting with "@". > > At the bare minimum, we should introduce an entity to generate "@" > (e.g. "\At") so one can always write > > \At_2 > > WDYT? My gut feeling tells me that scripts are "more important" than citations. [To me this is certainty not true, I always use subscripts inside latex fragments/envs]. But I can't think of anything better than your suggestion and I think it's acceptable. —Rasmus -- With monopolies the cake is a lie!