From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: tentative patch Re: commit found, was: Re: ECM for: issues with publishing to LaTeX using #INCLUDE Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:37:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87ioagt9yx.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <20150617.200443.1764368968080794485.roklein@roklein.de> <20150618085813.1630b824@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <20150618091550.57e2553f@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <20150618092142.6257f8f6@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <87ioal78nv.fsf@selenimh.access.network> <20150618142142.639189af@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <20150618205110.6ce38bf5@zotac> <20150619095140.3c6e8892@pckr150.mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <20150619202859.48888231@zotac> <87oaka58mi.fsf@selenimh.access.network> <20150621145522.6d13b2da@zotac> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6xCw-0006Gg-Lz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:35:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6xCv-0003j2-LS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:35:58 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:52387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6xCv-0003in-Ew for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:35:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150621145522.6d13b2da@zotac> (Robert Klein's message of "Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:55:22 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Klein Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Robert Klein writes: > I now used git bisect for both my current minimal setup (.emacs > attached as .femacs and the files ~/ot/1.org, ~/ot/2.org, and > ~/ot/3.org all three having the contents of the attached file 1.org) > and the setup and project I first encountered the issue. I still cannot reproduce the problem, i.e., 1.tex, 2.tex and 3.tex are identical. Could you try with emacs -Q instead of -q? Regards,