From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Some projects
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:37:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87io5uewfm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87wpub9jts.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87eggjar5u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87io5uzzv6.fsf@mbork.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46162)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZqOGs-00016Q-T2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:35:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZqOGs-0007bG-3F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:35:50 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:54840)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZqOGr-0007bC-SX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:35:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87io5uzzv6.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Sun, 25
	Oct 2015 17:18:48 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:

> Since your point is quite valid - and OTOH, I would like to put anything
> (or almost anything) in =code= markup, for instance (my use case: Emacs
> keybindings, try =C-x ,= - Org won't recognize it as code!).  I could
> mess up with org-emphasis-regexp-components in e.g. file local
> variables, but this is far from clean.

I cannot think of any bad consequence if we tailor "border" in
`org-emphasis-regexp-components' to allow everything but white spaces.

> Maybe a good solution would be to allow two syntaxes for markup:
> "short", like *bold* or =code=, and "long", like \textbf{bold} and
> \verb|code|.  If it is decided that such LaTeX-like syntax is fine, we
> could only introduce escaping of backslash and curly braces, which seems
> a decent compromise.

I don't think LaTeX-like syntax is good. It doesn't belong to
lightweight markup. Besides, Org already supports LaTeX macros so it
would probably be ambiguous.

I suggest to keep as close as possible to the existing markup.

Regards,