From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Malakhovski <oxij@oxij.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] factor out date-timestamp* calculations to
 org-store-link-props
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:45:44 +0000
Message-ID: <87io5im1hz.fsf@yin.lan>
References: <1446581747-1960-1-git-send-email-oxij@oxij.org>
	<1446581747-1960-7-git-send-email-oxij@oxij.org>
	<87io5ivwci.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39163)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <oxij@oxij.org>) id 1ZtwVs-0000ia-KB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:46:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <oxij@oxij.org>) id 1ZtwVn-0007w2-Ku
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:46:00 -0500
Received: from fujibayashi-1-pt.tunnel.tserv10.par1.ipv6.he.net
	([2001:470:1f12:446::2]:30020 helo=tricoro.koumakan.jp)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <oxij@oxij.org>) id 1ZtwVn-0007vy-FB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:45:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87io5ivwci.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:

> Can you introduce a let binding so that (date-to-time x) is only called
> once?

Ok.

> Also, what is ignore-errors protecting? The call to date-to-time, or
> format-time-string? I think the scope of ignore-errors should be as
> narrow as it can be.

I have no idea. I moved these lines from org-gnus, equivalent lines in
org-*other-mail-reader*s don't use ignore-errors at all. I don't use
gnus so went for the safest change.