From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Org campture recursively expands %-escapes
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:00:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87io4kn6cn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CA+iiQwTLDwpR-ypFitnpe7kKy8Kc0gdx1sixjRn39Vcuzzruxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<874mgb9gqv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8uEAHgs4XeyHCnqx_1AyieA-ZdR-8UntwHd7W_vUom7dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87d1uwpm1a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8uX6Q6GZpNbUVweZ6yCfhcRNj-0niOezHoU5RzqC5Jd=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87610o2wkz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52557)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a34N6-0004mr-DA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:58:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a34N3-00041J-5W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:58:40 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:53983)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a34N3-00041C-0E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:58:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87610o2wkz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:02:36 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Preindl <thomas.preindl@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>> i think i understand.  maybe we need another way to pass %i.
>
> I guess we could restict "%()" evaluation to the Sexp defined in the
> initial template.

I committed a patch along those lines in master. Please let me know if
anything goes wrong with capture templates.