Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>>
>>> I'm still not quite seeing this. This chunk should take care of it:
>>>
>>>     (goto-char e)
>>>     (if (bolp)
>>> 	(progn
>>> 	  (skip-chars-backward " \n\t")
>>> 	  (forward-line))
>>>       (end-of-line)
>>>       (insert "\n"))
>>>
>>> If "e" is EOB, we do `end-of-line' and insert a newline, it should be
>>> taken care of. I added a new clause in the test for this case, and it
>>> seems to work fine... Am I missing anything?
>>
>> I don't think so. It looks correct, indeed.
>>
>> However, you sent the wrong patch. Could you send the updated patch
>> again?
>
> Ooof, maybe I need to take a little vacation from the computer. This
> should be the right one.

Backing away from the keyboard now...