From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug in emphasis fontification
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 23:30:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87indodaqc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAFyQvY0UChHOatFkuhhbj+KChb=rTUHxDaeWz_t4o9fioC_oFw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43715)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eLGIV-0000fC-3H
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:30:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eLGIS-0003AE-0h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:30:11 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:55986)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eLGIR-000346-Py
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:30:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFyQvY0UChHOatFkuhhbj+KChb=rTUHxDaeWz_t4o9fioC_oFw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Kaushal Modi's message of "Fri, 01 Dec 2017 18:31:20 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> writes:

> I believe that the recent fontification rules still need tweaking.
>
> Here's a MWE:
>
> =====
> *bold*
> =====
>
> Here's a more detailed version:
>
> =====
> *bold*
> ^ above does not work
> *bold* this works at the time of typing.
> But on saving and doing =revert-buffer=, the fontification goes away.
> This *bold* fontification stays (starting emph char *and* ending emph char
> not at BOL/EOL).
>
> Looks like fontification is lost if emphasis chars are at BOL or EOL.

Hopefully fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou