From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Could we get rid of Org specific "mark ring"
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:53:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87inaijuo9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87o9lcntdq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8tSChMw42foWEGQOfYXfFy7FwnMYjFVUh_cm9YMWO2+CA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87po5rxcgq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8ss=sn_S1JWsN=jwvY=PmN=NLQDN6xUM89gULKcst6JRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fu6nx93a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8v3XwO-Tbb=_xdekU1KtyqkJM23nH0q-JXVG-embixfyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bmhbx7z6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8sbUv2MQiGcfDxBifTVwfg-jVO_NJV=UD2QpQuFMYaFjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJr1M6fyE0vp7sDSDHpJSRCHcwJUmXkTf5LQjRy7JrzedQJGOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJcAo8uY=unNM5sfTMhGt1ijKc-RJzNtEbTeObGGw-OdQD4XaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lggew91v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8vDXAq2kSxOFW9NAWmGpsRUAUYomtdG2XJYPgZZfkPP=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87muzy10mg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8vU9At7q=O0h95QLCxFAeLO+7DZczO=9D2M10aB_J92OA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87inal1og8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8v12ur_0ZvBAt3jeHqB_8D12ZngCXXZABd6C5wXdy1Gtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87po4rxomz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJcAo8u5BDWtb4psTZU27GEmE2dAo2sjxd2eVRLFe=4ZziQBdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJr1M6e0_jiitbpkLPd-n9itSd0tw-cT_s-4JXNKyUQ=1LWz9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48346)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eqhZR-0000S1-5T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:53:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eqhZM-0004X9-A9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:53:37 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:59468)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eqhZM-0004V3-37
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:53:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJr1M6e0_jiitbpkLPd-n9itSd0tw-cT_s-4JXNKyUQ=1LWz9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	(Allen Li's message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:09:12 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe> writes:

> I retract my previous stance and think that we should keep the
> org-mark-ring for now.  While I do not use the org-mark-ring, I do use
> xref's marker ring, and I appreciate the value of a "link ring"
> separate from mark-ring and global-mark-ring.

[...]

> My opinion is thus to keep org-mark-ring for now and discuss on
> emacs-devel.  It=E2=80=99s true that emacs-devel is conservative (and slo=
w),
> but I think it=E2=80=99s worth asking at least.

Then I suggest to bind `org-mark-ring-push' to `M-.' and
`org-mark-ring-goto' to `M-,', i.e., replace xref global bindings for
Org buffers. This will at least solve the third issue I pointed out.

Any objection?

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou