From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Fix org-meta-return for checkbox lists Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:10:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87in6kjg2o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87zhzx8b3o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1r0p34i.fsf@norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTpR8-0005c6-TW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:10:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTpR5-0006Nj-Kt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:10:46 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:32951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTpR5-0006MY-EA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:10:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:01:19 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-org list Hello, Kaushal Modi writes: > Is it that common to have mix of checkboxes and unordered lists items? The problem is that your initial suggestion make it impossible, common or not. > I would think that this behavior of org-meta-return is more consistent: > > - If you are on a "* foo" line, M-RET creates "* " on the next line. > - If you are on a "1. foo" line, M-RET creates "2. " on the next line. > - If you are on a "- foo" line, M-RET creates "- " on the next line. > - *But* if you are on a "- [ ] foo" line, M-RET still creates "- " instead > of "- [ ] " on the next line? > > Shouldn't M-RET and M-S-RET behavior be switched for checkbox lists? As it is, it is symmetric with M-RET and M-S-RET on headlines. E.g., in the following document * TODO Stuff| where "|" is point, M-RET results in * TODO Stuff * i.e., no TODO added. I find it straightforward. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738