From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Subject: Re: How to handle an inline multiline noweb reference
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:20:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87in0eoamj.fsf@mbork.pl>
References: <87wooykg59.fsf@mbork.pl>
	<CAAjq1meyEEKyUn8A03doMr8c-45ccZaN8ZACmZvSZSvyR=PsxQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJcAo8vmzyQ2ShMAP4+s+yYfJzrchejAUGnMn8_1yQS3jfU72w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bm69k7ce.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53933)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gSkca-0001W5-4E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:22:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gSkcV-0008IT-2k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:22:24 -0500
Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:46476)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gSkcU-0008HE-P0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:22:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <87bm69k7ce.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric S Fraga <esflists@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com>


On 2018-11-28, at 08:08, Eric S Fraga <esflists@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 27 Nov 2018 at 19:33, Samuel Wales wrote:
>> this might be the most ridiculous idea you have ever heard, but does
>> babel have a concept similar to stdio pipes?  i've often wanted to
>> just pipe stuff.  dunno if this would help marcin.
>>
>> the only inter-block communication i am aware of are variables and
>> noweb inclusion.
>
> Check out the :post option for src blocks.  May be exactly what you
> want.

Thanks, this looks *very* promising!

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl