From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Subject: Re: org-drill futures Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 16:48:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87imto3s5p.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <87zhpunb65.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXSj4-0005n7-9J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 11:48:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXSj3-0002MB-8f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 11:48:50 -0400 Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([78.129.138.110]:45168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXSj2-0001PT-Qu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 11:48:49 -0400 Received: from cpc142652-benw12-2-0-cust953.16-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.21.43.186]:50484 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hXSiI-0006NV-SP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 16:48:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Phillip Lord's message of "Sat, 16 Mar 2019 14:31:14 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I've launched an fork of org-drill. I have tried to reach Paul Sexton, the original author, and had some feedback (he was happy for my take over), but not managed to get the repository moved. https://gitlab.com/phillord/org-drill/ I'd like to have this be the version that ends up in contrib. Can anyone tell me how to achieve this? Phil phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > I've been using org-drill a lot recently. I've already added one feature > that I consider vital for this kind of thing (answering by typing!) and > would like to add another (some form of Leitner box learning). > > But, it seems sensible to fix the maintainership first. Are any of the > forks out there active at the moment? If not, I'd be willing to take > over the maintainership for a while. Is anyone else interested? Does > anyone object? > > Phil