From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bugs report Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:19:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87hco7cecc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87bqefj1kd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1c754ee151dff3d0dcc8457f29f57a27@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I9hX7-0008TV-Kn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:19:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I9hX6-0008TJ-6s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:19:37 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I9hX6-0008TG-1H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:19:36 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.225]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I9hX5-00044w-ML for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:19:35 -0400 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so292833huc for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:19:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1c754ee151dff3d0dcc8457f29f57a27@science.uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sat\, 14 Jul 2007 07\:27\:09 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: >> - Org-mode is so powerful that i tend to use it on the top of .txt files >> (mostly drafts). It recently happened that i exported such a file to >> ASCII using org-export, and the new .txt overwrote the old file >> without asking. > > Bummer! Hmm, how should we handle this? file.txt.txt? Or a query? I guess a query is okay, since this situation is not likely to happen very often. >> - [ ] This is an example. >> ^ ^ >> 1 2 > > Hmmmm. Does look good, I must admit. Now sure how to make > this work with M-q wrapping. But I am putting it on the list. I would say this is more an issue for TAB than M-q. Filling can be left as it is, while pressing tab should better push the line to the second position. Best, -- Bastien