From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Lundin Subject: Re: Filtering for effort in org-agenda Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:05:10 -0500 Message-ID: <87hc19ic15.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <87tz5aq48u.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ab72d9xs.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87iqlp3mxx.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <6A61D6DF-501B-422A-BBBE-D57382792201@gmail.com> <87eiwd3jz4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <0DCAB8F2-FD3E-471D-9818-ABD272568609@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lom4q-0005VE-0N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:05:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lom4l-0005UK-Cf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:04:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42241 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lom4k-0005U2-Ij for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:04:54 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:34238) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lom4k-000464-16 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:04:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0DCAB8F2-FD3E-471D-9818-ABD272568609@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:12:59 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Bernt Hansen , Org Mode List Carsten Dominik writes: > I ended up introducing a new operator "?" for this special purpose. > So now, please filter > > C-c a t / N / + ? > > The comparing operators <, >, and = now all treat tasks without effort > according to the setting in `org-sort-agenda-noeffort-means-high', as 0 > or 32767 minutes, respectively. > > Matt, is that acceptable also for you, or do you want an option to > actually totally ignore entries without an effort defined? This is great. If I want to ignore entries without an effort defined, I can just filter with "- ?". I've also gone ahead and set org-sort-agenda-noeffort-means-high to t, which accomplishes precisely the behavior I was looking for. Thanks! Matt