From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mead Subject: Re: More conspicous header lines Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:36:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbx3n6ci.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877hy09xjw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTtnf-0004Mo-6E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:37:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTtna-0004KC-4y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:37:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47781 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTtnZ-0004K2-VU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:37:10 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:56958 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTtnZ-0005ue-8X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:37:09 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MTtnW-00050e-Np for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:37:06 +0000 Received: from cpc3-rdng14-0-0-cust786.winn.cable.ntl.com ([82.0.211.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:37:06 +0000 Received: from paul.d.mead by cpc3-rdng14-0-0-cust786.winn.cable.ntl.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:37:06 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > > Please people vote. It's a tiny change but since we all have different > preferences for such things, it's good to have a sense of what everyone > thinks... What are we voting for, to make this *possible* or *default*? Paul