From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:00:21 +0800 Message-ID: <87hbvxsza2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87skfgxn0f.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdkduo9s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ocq4xgxd.fsf@gmail.com> <5ea706d0908250520u62ca057cq138201f1397b2c4b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfxWQ-0004Ns-S3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:01:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfxWM-0004M5-El for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:01:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37787 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfxWM-0004M0-7G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:01:14 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245]:20217) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfxWL-0005Yr-De for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:01:13 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so1458577ana.21 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:01:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5ea706d0908250520u62ca057cq138201f1397b2c4b@mail.gmail.com> (Chris Leyon's message of "Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:20:53 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Chris Leyon Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list Chris Leyon writes: > Another solution would be to use "f" and "b" to move forward and > backward in time. Some other Agenda bindings would have to change to > accommodate this. Old "f" (org-agenda-follow-mode) could become "F" > which is unused. But "b" and "B" are both used and would need to be > remapped. > > Obviously this is not the easiest possible solution. However, these > bindings would be very consistent with the conventions of most other > Emacs packages. Agreed. -- Bastien