From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:57:01 -0700 Message-ID: <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45679 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeuGM-00068m-B6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:57:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeuGK-00083a-Ah for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:57:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:43587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeuGK-000837-6A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:57:08 -0500 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so1210741pwj.0 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:57:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> (Jason Dunsmore's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:01:54 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Bastien , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik >> >> My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's >> expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg >> css available as alternative css. > Sounds good, I like the idea of combining the two styles. I don't know how alternate css stylesheets work, but I would say the more options the better. Which has the added benefit of keeping the option open of future css submissions from Orgers with more web-design experience. > > Sounds good. But first.. I noticed an issue with the expandable TOC on > a couple of pages: > > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/org-faq.html > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/org-glossary.html > > Does it have something to do with the javascript section-folding? > > By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some > pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience. > Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer > needed? > Yes the javascript is probably the culprit here, I agree that with the hidden TOC it is probably not required. My preference would be to remove the section folding (and use of javascript) from Worg entirely. Cheers -- Eric > > Regards, > Jason