From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Subject: Re: Unintended behavior? Links without description
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:11:11 +0100
Message-ID: <87hbc8vr7k.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4D19BC26.8030904@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47338 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoNgL-0004hV-MI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:11:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1PoNgJ-0002lr-OC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:11:09 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:65208)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1PoNgJ-0002ll-HY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:11:07 -0500
Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so4307762bwz.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:11:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D19BC26.8030904@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of
	"Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:29:58 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: mail@christianmoe.com
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

Hi Christian,

Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:

> I think I've tracked down the problem, but I don't necessarily understand
> what org-export-normalize-links is supposed to do or what other behaviors
> depend on this, so I'm not going to submit a patch. If this is now the
> intended behavior, it will be no problem to rewrite the custom link export
> definitions to take account of it.

Here again*, I think org-export-normalize-links: various backends will
decide what to do about having identical [path] and [desc].

I'd welcome a patch making org-bbdb.el a bit more clever about this.

Thanks!

* see my recent email about org-footnote-normalize

-- 
 Bastien