From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: syntax bugs in footnotes
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:16:15 +0200
Message-ID: <87hb9heals.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikWRi9sXt+H-WXiSVJUOpg6DvXkOA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38071)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QFis7-0002zL-GQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:16:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QFis6-0004pU-Gp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:16:19 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:57152)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QFis6-0004pI-8r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:16:18 -0400
Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so3370929wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikWRi9sXt+H-WXiSVJUOpg6DvXkOA@mail.gmail.com> (Samuel
	Wales's message of "Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:55:57 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> Bug 1: commented incomplete footnote interacts with link in
> later text.  Result is that comments get exported.  IMO
> comments should be absolute except in the case of #+ lines.
>
> # [fn::I will call this the status quo effect for lack of an
> # existing term.  It isn't a true bias like status quo
>
> see this.  see [[this link][this link]].  and see this too.
>
> Bug 2: partial exporting of inline footnote after an inline
> footnote.[fn::watch][fn::this]
>
> Bug 3: closing bracket in a link closes footnote.[fn::Try
> exporting [[http://google.com][google]] this.]

As I'm already working on footnotes (to fix bug 3 actually, as reported
by Thomas S. Dye recently), I will look at the other two.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou