From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-crypt: only warn about auto-save-mode when running org-decrypt Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:05:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87hb7al18d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87hb7febzu.fsf@gnu.org> <1308949422-30288-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org> <11546.1308952204@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <8762ntjdwr.fsf@praet.org> <87pqlzutfl.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4c6fnrh.fsf@praet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbVAd-0000k7-F2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:05:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbVAb-0006kb-Uf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:05:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:54561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbVAb-0006kV-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:05:25 -0400 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so29190wwf.30 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:05:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4c6fnrh.fsf@praet.org> (Pieter Praet's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:55:46 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Pieter Praet Cc: Dave Abrahams , Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Pieter, Pieter Praet writes: > 2 lessons I've learned today: > - DON'T test this stuff in a *scratch* buffer (seriously...) > - DO consume sufficient quantities of coffee (IOW, org-encrypt-entries > doesn't encrypt entries unless they're *tagged* to be) :) >> I'm not confident in disabling auto-save-mode globally by default, this >> would surprise users -- even with a **BiG WaRnInG** message. > > No worries, it's buffer-local. > > And I've now changed the default to "ask first, shoot in the foot > later". This is good. Thanks! -- Bastien