From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: mlorg : yet another parser for org-mode (Written in OCaml contained in org-mode files) Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:20:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87hay8a259.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20120226164145.GA28270@ananas> <20120227170602.GA12110@ananas> <87d390rzfj.fsf@gmx.com> <20100801233738.GA18949@litchi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S35yJ-0001gU-VN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:23:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S35yD-00084C-K1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:23:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:40159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S35yD-00083d-BF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:22:57 -0500 Received: by wgbgn7 with SMTP id gn7so310580wgb.30 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:22:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100801233738.GA18949@litchi> (Simon Castellan's message of "Mon, 2 Aug 2010 01:37:38 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Simon Castellan Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Eric Schulte Hello, Simon Castellan writes: > Thank you very much for this pointer, This is what I was looking for : > a list of syntaxic construction in org-mode. I'd say though that it > lacks a more-or-less formal syntaxic definition of constructions. It lacks that, indeed, among many other things. On the other hand, it's a work in progress, so I guess that explains why. I had postponed such a definition of constructions, since the model used to describe the Org format wasn't (and still isn't) complete. Actually, the list that you can observe in org-element.el will change a little during the next few weeks. Anyway, I agree that a document formally describing each element/object in Org has to be written at some point. Even if I think it's one or two months too early for that task, I'll gladly offer my help if you decide to undertake it nonetheless. Do not hesitate to ask if you need more information. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou