From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: C-c ^ not fully useful Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:28:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87hal0pws8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <86vc9p1kiu.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uMY-0001U8-US for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:28:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uMX-0005eH-Pm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:28:46 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]:39552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uMX-0005eA-JG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:28:45 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so2313004wey.0 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:28:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86vc9p1kiu.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Fran=E7o?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?is?= Pinard"'s message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:36:57 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi François, sorting list items and headlines is now done against the visible part of the item and headlines, i.e., it ignores hidden links and emphasis markers. I am not sure it is useful to add a parameter to `org-sort-list' and `org-sort-entries' to let the user change this default behavior: do you have a significant use-case for this? François Pinard writes: > - Could some parameterisation be added so one could map user written > functions over (free) option letters? Here again, my feeling is that it would be over-engineered -- would you use it yourself? How? Thanks for suggesting this improvements! -- Bastien