From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Error with :wrap org in babel and 8.0-pre Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:24:05 -0600 Message-ID: <87haj6cxa5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87li8ncqzq.fsf@gmail.com> <87li8jfysj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5cjy3du.fsf@gmail.com> <87txn7y2hb.fsf@gmail.com> <874nf7fsix.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj2re7xl.fsf@gmail.com> <87obdfe5mo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1US7mH-0002Zq-Ed for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:26:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1US7mC-0000I5-8u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:26:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:59284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1US7mC-0000Hu-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:26:32 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id bg2so397820pad.23 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:26:31 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , emacs-orgmode , Christian Moe John Hendy writes: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Christian Moe wrote: >> >> Eric Schulte writes: >>>> - Is =:results drawer= what we want as the syntax to get org syntax >>>> parsed by the exporter? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> Just guessing from the name, it strikes me as a fix or enhancement for >>>> some other behavior/option that's now being applied to code as an >>>> after thought. >>>> >>> >>> As I recall this solution came about because drawers are the best (maybe >>> only) way to demarcate a region without changing its semantics (which is >>> exactly what we want in this case). >> >> I suppose you've considered delimiting results in general with e.g. a >> line like #+END_RESULTS? >> > Drawers are the preferred solution here. Thanks, > > As in compiling with simply =:results output raw= and then adding my > own #+end_results line after the block? > > If so, I haven't tried that. But :wrap with no second argument creates > #+begin/end_results, which doesn't export correctly. > > > Thanks, > John > >> Needless clutter for the most part, I know. But perhaps useful in this >> kind of case. Also safe, semantically neutral, and possibly more >> intuitive than drawers, with less special behaviors in terms of >> visibility and export. >> >> Yours, >> Christian >> >> -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte