From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: gnus: link annoyance Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:43:51 -0500 Message-ID: <87ha9fr8ko.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <87zjn9w79w.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <874n5hca77.fsf@pank.eu> <87ha9g2w1p.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <8738kzgbv4.fsf@crunchbang.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <871u0jesy6.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ahM-0002Oi-1q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:44:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ahD-0001En-Dl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:44:15 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ahD-0001EW-12 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:44:07 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ah9-0006lv-Vt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:44:03 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:44:03 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:44:03 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > 2014/1/7 François Pinard > > I'm far from being sure, but if I wanted to use Org as a mean to write > HTML or PDF as message attachments, I would think it could be done with > a very moderate amount of Emacs Lisp customization.  Unless mistaken, > the Org editor to HTML might yield its output in a temporary Emacs > buffer, (for PDF, maybe not) and I would be fairly surprised if message > composition does not have facilities to receive attachments from > buffers.  And even if one would have to go through an external file, the > extra overhead might be negligible in practice.  Putting all the pieces > together might require some work, but maybe not that much. > > Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I am  not at all able to do such a work, and I very > probably will never be able to.  > But maybe this suggestion will be interesting for an emacs org-mode developer, who knows... > Not sure how relevant this is (I haven't read this part of the thread carefully - Some time! Some time! My kingdom for some time!!!) but it's at least not entirely unrelated: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-mime.html Nick