From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: plain lists folded by default Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:41:46 -0500 Message-ID: <87ha8evcdx.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <52D68750.2020408@parisdescartes.fr> <87fvopxa2g.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <52F1376A.8040303@parisdescartes.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAmou-0005pA-K6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:42:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAmom-0000jp-19 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:42:12 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAmol-0000jd-K2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:42:03 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAmok-0004Ve-9l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:42:02 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:42:02 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:42:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org So I was looking for this article using gmane's web interface and I couldn't see it. Turns out that you followed up on a different article (subject line was "auto-fill-mode for text changes (plain-lists) indentation"), so this thread got subsumed under that name. Please don't do that: if it is a different question, start a different thread. And conversely, although this is not the case here, if it is the same subject, stay on the same thread: don't start another. Violating either of these principles makes it harder to search the ML for answers. [And I should make it clear that these comments are not directed exclusively at Rémy: in particular, I have been guilty of the second transgression numerous times, so I am included in the target. AFAIK, I have not transgressed against the first principle - although it is arguable that this very note is indeed such a transgression :-)] -- Nick