From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Escaping again! Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:00:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87ha478iyd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNMd-0000Rz-FU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:01:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNMU-0008BV-F2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:00:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]:44286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNMU-0008BE-3P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:00:46 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x13so2036591wgg.22 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:00:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Rustom Mody's message of "Fri, 30 May 2014 19:03:24 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rustom Mody Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Rustom, Rustom Mody writes: > - \(+\):: Int → Int → Int > - \(-\):: Int → Int →Int > - \(\leq\):: Int → Int → Bool > - \(=\):: Int → Int → Bool 1. \(+\) :: Int → Int → Int 2. \(-\) :: Int → Int →Int 3. \(\leq\) :: Int → Int → Bool 4. \(=\) :: Int → Int → Bool would do -- but this is not entirely satisfactory. For now description lists accept both "-" and "+". I'm all for allowing only "-" so that we could use + \(+\) :: Int → Int → Int + \(-\) :: Int → Int →Int + \(\leq\) :: Int → Int → Bool + \(=\) :: Int → Int → Bool in your example. What do you and others think? -- Bastien