From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Harkins Subject: Re: org-habit for multiple arbitrary days in a week Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:19:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87h9z7jvlu.wl-jamshark70@qq.com> References: <87bnpgbisi.wl-jamshark70@qq.com> <8761footez.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdqmY-00070G-Ut for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:20:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdqmT-0004nv-EX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:20:10 -0400 Received: from smtpproxy19.qq.com ([184.105.206.84]:33331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XdqmS-0004f1-HA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:20:05 -0400 Received: from hjh-e431.qq.com (unknown [113.109.17.166]) by esmtp4.qq.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id 0 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:19:57 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <8761footez.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:56:04 +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > ** TODO Update lesson gradesheet :Comp: > > SCHEDULED: <2014-10-13 Mon +1w> > > SCHEDULED: <2014-10-17 Fri +1w> > > You can't. This is invalid Org syntax (only one scheduled keyword per > entry). I see... perhaps it should be filed under "wish list" to support an "arbitrary days of week" repeater style. One way might be something like "<2014-10-13 Mon +4d +3d>": First advance by 4 days, then by 3 days, then 4 again and so on. I would call it a low priority enhancement. There might actually be some benefit to tracking consistency on the two days separately. But the fact remains, if someone needed to treat it as one task that happens on two or three arbitrary days during the week (always the same days) and it wouldn't be useful for her to split them, org-habit currently does not support this as far as I can see. hjh