From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9uu13wz.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87sieokx8e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com> <87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com> <87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com> <87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpzicjn.fsf@pank.eu> <87y4o6xi0h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4mdst5.fsf@gmx.us> <87pp9ixfws.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7dF-0001M3-Uc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:01:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7dA-0006bJ-RE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:01:25 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7dA-0006aG-Hk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:01:20 -0500 Received: from x200s ([109.201.154.147]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mbx62-1Y56761mpq-00JKax for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pp9ixfws.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:41:07 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I think > > [cite: common pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; common post] > > is regular and readable enough. So, there's no need to add special > support for multicite. Definitely. In latex you'd just use multicite whenever more than two keys within one cite-group. [cite: common pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; common post] =E2=86=92 \textcites(common pre)(common post)[pre1][post1]{k1}[pre2][pos= t2]{k2} ^^^=20 And: [cite: @k1; k2] =E2=86=92 \textcites()()[][]{k1}[][]{k2} or \textcites{k1}{k2} =E2=80=94Rasmus --=20 Lasciate ogni speranza o voi che entrate: siete nella mani di'machellaio