From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Why not push? Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwMd-0002jH-7C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:23:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwMY-000120-Fy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:23:47 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:50112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwMY-00011j-9F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:23:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537AB52072 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:23:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Koof9c6RVfzz for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:23:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 261AA52063 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:23:40 +0100 (CET) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-Mode mailing list Hi there, I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following construction: (setq list (cons (something) list)) Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there? Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University