From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Lawrence Subject: Re: Citation syntax: Underscore MUST(?) be allowed in cite keys? Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:50:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87h9tuyph6.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <874mq0399a.fsf@gmx.us> <54F75222.8030805@gmail.com> <87pp8o1t9f.fsf@gmx.us> <87pp8o6nt9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87fv9i9z8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnk60zhc.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54FA9AA9.9070505@gmail.com> <87r3t05okc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioeci6f6.fsf@gmx.us> <87r3szk6q9.fsf@gmx.us> <87oao3yluf.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2yqyx55.fsf@berkeley.edu> <871tkyxgjg.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YV2lx-0007Ip-Lv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:51:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YV2lu-00081n-9U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:51:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:38209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YV2lu-00080D-3D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:51:22 -0400 Received: by pabrd3 with SMTP id rd3so50775179pab.5 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Tom and all, "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > The problem is limited to the shortcut citations and doesn't affect the > [cite: ...] form, which can be expected to work without modification > wherever it is placed IIUC. Actually, it occurs to me now that this might even affect the [cite: ...] form, depending on how you use the prefix and suffix text. Suppose you often write citations like: [cite: See @Doe99, and references therein, for more.] For readability's sake, I would hope this would be parsed by default as: - prefix: 'See ' - key: 'Doe99' - suffix: ', and references therein, for more.' and rendered like: See Doe (1999), and references therein, for more. I can imagine similar cases at least for periods, colons, and semi-colons (though those would have to be written as entities here), so maybe we cannot avoid this problem just by changing or removing the shortcut syntax. Best, Richard